by CONGRESSMAN TEDDY CASIÑO
The added years of high school under the government’s K+12 program would mean an additional burden to parents of P9,816 per student per year, or a total of P58,897 in additional education expenses for average Filipino families with three children, a figure too costly for them to bear.
I’m basing this estimate on the annual Family Income and Expenditure Statistics (FIES) which show that typical Filipino families with three children spend an average of P7,548.50 per year on education fees alone. Add to this is the incidental cost of education (to include daily transportation, food and clothing) which I estimate at P7,300 per student per year, then a typical Filipino family with three children would have to spend an additional P29,448.50 per added year of high school for their kids.
At two years under the K+12 program, this would add up to P58,897 in additional expenses.
For poor families earning less than P100,000 per year, comprising 35% of total families, the cost would be a little lower at P22,788.56 per year for three children. This would take up as much as 33.94% of total annual family expenditures.
For extremely poor families, the cost would be P22,064.86 per year for three children, comprising a whopping 66.92% of total family expenditures.
While DepEd officials insist that tuition is free in public schools, families still have to spend for transportation, food, school uniforms, projects and other incidentals. Kasama ng mga school fees hindi na biro ‘yan. That’s a fortune for most families.
Today’s average annual family expenditure is around P175,000. Thus the additional expense of almost P60,000 for two more years of high school would mean that a considerable chunk of their income allotted for basic necessities like food, shelter and clothing would have to be diverted to education.
We might have a world-standard curriculum but if families can’t afford to send their children to school, what’s the point?
The higher cost of sending children to school would most likely result in more dropouts espcially among the poor and extremely poor families. We are, in effect, marginalizing the already marginalized sectors of our society. Lalo lang nito pinapahirapan ang mga mahihirap na gustong makatapos sa pag-aaral.
If government insists on K+12, it should be ready to subsidize the additional cost to poor families, otherwise we will be seeing more dropouts. But the way I see it, it seems the government is not ready to allocate even the international standard of 6% GDP for education.
Dapat talagang tantanan na muna ng Malacanang ang mga magulang dahil napakalaking dagdag gastusin ito sa mga pamilya lalo pa ngayon na ang taas ng presyo ng mga bilihin at serbisyo at napakababa pa ng sahod. Dapat ay mas tutukan ng pamahalaan kung paano gumawa ng mas maraming classrooms at mga teacher pero dahil sa K+12 e mas lalong lumaki ang mga kakulangang ito.
Popular posts from this blog
MGA TANONG AT SAGOT HINGGIL SA Kto12 PROGRAM NG GOBYERNO NG PILIPINAS Posted on May 28, 2012 by David Michael San Juan MGA TANONG AT SAGOT HINGGIL SA Kto12 PROGRAM NG GOBYERNO NG PILIPINAS (Paunawa: Simpleng lenggwahe ang ginamit sa artikulong ito upang madaling maintindihan ng mayorya.) For the full English version please visit http://www.scribd.com/david_juan_1/d/70033985-San-Juan-David-Michael-Full-Paper-Kto12 TANONG: ANO ANG KTO12 PROGRAM? SAGOT: Ang Kto12 Program ng gobyerno ng Pilipinas ay tumutukoy sa pagkakaroon ng mandatory o required na kindergarten at karagdagang 2 taon sa dating 10-year Basic Education Cycle. Kung noon, pagkatapos ng anim na taon sa elementarya at apat na taon sa hayskul (kabuuang 10 taon) ay maaari nang makapagkolehiyo ang mga estudyante. Sa ilalim ng Kto12, bago makapagkolehiyo, kailangan pa nilang dumaan sa karagdagang 2 taon pagkatapos ng apat na taong hayskul. Sa bagong sistema, tinatawag na senior high school o junior
This blog now averages about 1500 views per day. It has more than 600 posts and the number of visits from the Philippines has now reached a total of 300,000. It has been more than a year and while trying to condense this entire blog into its most salient points, I came across Diane Ravitch's new book " Reign of Error ". (Ravitch, Diane (2013-09-17). Reign of Error: The Hoax of the Privatization Movement and the Danger to America's Public Schools (Kindle Locations 6029-6030). Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group. Kindle Edition.) The book is notably and strongly supported by data and research.
There is information to be gained from data. Tests in schools can be informative. Scores of students provide a quick glimpse of the current state of education. Thus, it is useful to have these numbers. These numbers may not tell everything in detail with high accuracy. Nevertheless, test results allow for a useful perspective. The National Achievement Test administered by the Department of Education (DepEd) in the Philippines, a set of standardized tests addressing the major subjects taught in school, is an example. These tests are given to Grade 3 where students are assessed in both English and Filipino (These two subjects comprise two thirds of the exam) and Math and Science (These two account for the remaining one third). A different set of tests is given to Grade 6 pupils where each of the following 5 subjects is assigned 40 items: (Science, Math, English, Filipino and Social Studies). Another set is administered to fourth year high school students (This is currently the last year