Why Physics First: An Alternative to Spiral Curriculum in the Sciences
There is a movement regarding science education in high school in the United States that has been increasing in popularity. Spearheaded by a Nobel laureate in physics, Leon Lederman, "Physics First" makes the claim that the proper sequence for teaching the sciences in high school should be physics, followed by chemistry, and then biology. The project "American Renaissance in Science Education" summarizes this order in the following flow chart:
|Figure downloaded from http://ed.fnal.gov/arise/arise_lml/arise_science.html|
|Downloaded from http://www.physicsfirstmo.org/files/Brochure%20Aug09B.pdf|
"Anecdotal evidence alone, however, cannot confirm the success of the physics-first curriculum. Richard Feynman, renowned physicist and Nobel laureate, spoke of this lack of credible studies in science education almost 40 years ago. "There is an enormous number of studies and a great deal of statistics," he said in a speech about education at the Galileo Symposium in Italy in 1964, "…but they are mixtures of anecdotes, uncontrolled experiments, and very poorly controlled experiments, so that there is very little information as a result." Following this logic, the physics-first curriculum cannot be declared a complete success without well-controlled studies showing its utility in raising science literacy."
From "Physics First in Science Education Reform"
Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Pennsylvania
Have you come across "Learning Physics as One Nation (LPON) by Dr. Chris Bernido and Dr. Marivic Bernido (husband and wife team and 2010 Ramon Magsaysay Foundation awardees)? You may find how to get to the article here: http://cvif.awardspace.com/lponproject.htmlReplyDelete
Yes, I think it is briefly discussed in one of the articles posted on this blog.ReplyDelete