DepEd's K to 12 and Elephants in a Room
The graph below from Marcotte and Hansen demonstrates how big the effects are of adding 10 school days to learning outcomes compared to those of other interventions:
10 additional instructional days even work better than having an effective teacher. If just adding ten days is so influential, perhaps adding two years will lead to even greater effects. However, grade retention, also shown in the above graph, adds a year, but its effect is less than the improvement seen with just 10 additional instructional days.
Another elephant in the room in terms of education issues becomes obvious with another graph from Marcotte and Hansen. This one shows what happens when school days are missed because of snow.
The figure above shows how many schools in the state of Maryland fail to meet adequate yearly progress targets set by the No Child Left Behind law. If one takes into account school closing days because of snow, the number of failing schools would have been much smaller (bars with darker shade).
In this aspect, it is not difficult to realize that the Philippines does face a huge challenge in providing adequate and continuous instructional hours in basic education. One simply has to go through some of this week's headlines from GMA News:
This is an entire week of no school. The main reason is flooding as depicted here in a photo from the Daily Inquirer:
These pictures have become too common that this issue is now plainly considered an elephant in a room, a problem no one is really willing to address.
This morning Yahoo was highlighting a different photo:
A week ago before the rains and the flood, EuroNews called the following as "picture of the day":
Yes, where is the outrage? How does a change in curriculum in basic curriculum costing more than one hundred billion pesos address these challenges? Of course, it does not. The change in curriculum is meant to address those who have plans of working in other countries and are supposedly mistreated for lacking two years of basic education. The change in curriculum is supposed to please those who have the belief that a spiral progression in math and the sciences works better. The change in curriculum addresses not one of the obvious conditions shown above. These are elephants in a room.