An Appeal to the Honorable Justices of the Supreme Court of the Philippines
“Speak up for those who cannot speak for themselves, ensure justice for those being crushed.
Yes, speak up for the poor and helpless, and see they get justice.”
On March 12, 2015, the Council of Teachers and Staff of Colleges and Universities of the Philippines (CoTeSCUP), along with 15 labor organizations and four individuals, filed a petition for Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) against the implementation of Republic Act 10533, more commonly known as the K-12 Law. The petitioners questioned the constitutionality of the said law, and underscored how it violated the labor rights of professors and staff, and the academic freedom of the teaching personnel of higher educational institutions (HEIs). The succeeding three months saw other affected education stakeholders file their respective petitions for TRO on other constitutional grounds. All petitioners are united in the conviction that the K-12 Law is fundamentally flawed, and its full implementation in June 2016 is expected to have disastrous results.
Since then, however, we witnessed the slow turn of the wheels of justice. After the Supreme Court has released an order that all petitions are to be consolidated, the Aquino Government, led by the Office of the Solicitor General (OSG), very slowly worked on the government response to the petitions that caused delays in the proceedings. In the meantime, many HEIs have used the opportunity to streamline their personnel by offering ‘voluntary’ separation packages; owners of private schools rush to prepare for senior high school; public school teachers continue to lament the lack of preparedness for K-12; government agencies hastily craft ‘safety nets’ and guidelines; and parents and students become burdened with the confusion generated by the K-12 Law. All of these resulted from the manner by which the Aquino government stubbornly pushed for such a massive educational reform despite the lack of consultation with affected education stakeholders, lack of educational infrastructure, and low absorptive capacity of education agencies to implement the K-12 Law. The past 11 months of waiting for the Supreme Court to rule on the petitions revealed the many gaps and loopholes in the K-12 Law and its ongoing implementation, with its dire consequences already affecting the lives and livelihood of education stakeholders.
For these reasons, we humbly appeal to the Honorable Justices of the Supreme Court to rule on the merits of the petitions for TRO immediately. As the batch of Grade 10 students is at risk of being disenfranchised from earning a high school diploma and enrolling in tertiary education which they rightfully deserve, their parents are saddled with additional educational expenses, and HEI professors and staff are made to desperately cling to their jobs. Time is of essence, and further delays in the ruling will only compound the confusion, agony, and anxieties already being experienced by those on the ground. We ask the Supreme Court to decide on the side of the teachers and staff, parents and students, who have been pushed to the margins by a law that purportedly honors international commitments, but victimizes citizens and violates the Constitution. We have much respect for the independence and prudence of this Supreme Court, and as our last resort, we look forward to a decision that favors the most disadvantaged stakeholders in the education sector --- teachers and staff, parents, and students.
Suspend K-12 NOW!
06 February 2016
Contact: Prof. Rene Luis M. Tadle
Lead Convener, CoTeSCUP and Suspend K-12 Coalition email@example.com / 0923-672-6069 / 0917-307-9697
Popular posts from this blog
Hapag ng Pag-asa, Painting by Joey A. Velasco The following is an article written by Fr. James B. Reuter, S.J., originally published on the Philippine Star . HAPAG NG PAG-ASA. By Fr. James B. Reuter, S.J. The Philippine Star 04/21/2007 At the entrance of the Major Seminary of the University of Santo Tomas , in Manila , you will see a painting. It is the "Last Supper" of Joey A. Velasco. It portrays poor children from Metro Manila, all between the ages of 4 and 14, at the Last Supper with Christ Our Lord. He has called it "Hapag ng Pag-asa", the table of hope. To start with, it is not really a table. It is a big delivery box, knocked apart and nailed together again as a table. Joey Velasco himself has said: "This painting reveals a story of greater hunger than a plate of rice could satisfy. What these children are starved for is love." Realizing that his little models were real persons, he investigated the life of each of them, and wrote
MGA TANONG AT SAGOT HINGGIL SA Kto12 PROGRAM NG GOBYERNO NG PILIPINAS Posted on May 28, 2012 by David Michael San Juan MGA TANONG AT SAGOT HINGGIL SA Kto12 PROGRAM NG GOBYERNO NG PILIPINAS (Paunawa: Simpleng lenggwahe ang ginamit sa artikulong ito upang madaling maintindihan ng mayorya.) For the full English version please visit http://www.scribd.com/david_juan_1/d/70033985-San-Juan-David-Michael-Full-Paper-Kto12 TANONG: ANO ANG KTO12 PROGRAM? SAGOT: Ang Kto12 Program ng gobyerno ng Pilipinas ay tumutukoy sa pagkakaroon ng mandatory o required na kindergarten at karagdagang 2 taon sa dating 10-year Basic Education Cycle. Kung noon, pagkatapos ng anim na taon sa elementarya at apat na taon sa hayskul (kabuuang 10 taon) ay maaari nang makapagkolehiyo ang mga estudyante. Sa ilalim ng Kto12, bago makapagkolehiyo, kailangan pa nilang dumaan sa karagdagang 2 taon pagkatapos ng apat na taong hayskul. Sa bagong sistema, tinatawag na senior high school o junior
There is information to be gained from data. Tests in schools can be informative. Scores of students provide a quick glimpse of the current state of education. Thus, it is useful to have these numbers. These numbers may not tell everything in detail with high accuracy. Nevertheless, test results allow for a useful perspective. The National Achievement Test administered by the Department of Education (DepEd) in the Philippines, a set of standardized tests addressing the major subjects taught in school, is an example. These tests are given to Grade 3 where students are assessed in both English and Filipino (These two subjects comprise two thirds of the exam) and Math and Science (These two account for the remaining one third). A different set of tests is given to Grade 6 pupils where each of the following 5 subjects is assigned 40 items: (Science, Math, English, Filipino and Social Studies). Another set is administered to fourth year high school students (This is currently the last year