Why Decentralization Matters
|Above copied from the Department of Education, Philippines|
Years ago, Linda Darling-Hammond wrote in the National Education Association in the United States the following:
...Over the past 40 years, Finland has shifted from a highly centralized system emphasizing external testing to a more localized system in which highly trained teachers design curriculum around the very lean national standards. This new system is implemented through equitable funding and extensive preparation for all teachers. The logic of the system is that investments in the capacity of local teachers and schools to meet the needs of all students, coupled with thoughtful guidance about goals, can unleash the benefits of local creativity in the cause of common, equitable outcomes...."Highly trained teachers design curriculum around the very lean national standards" is obviously the exact opposite of what the Department of Education in the Philippines is doing. Finland is one good example but there are examples from the United States. After all, basic education in the United States, unlike in the Philippines, is not highly centralized.
A program called Schools of Opportunity highlights schools in the US that provide excellent prospects for all students. This year, one of the schools that the program has recognized is the Chicago High School for Agricultural Sciences (CHSAS). In 2014, the Opportunity Structures for Preparation and Inspiration (OSPrI) project published a study that examined closely the curriculum at CHSAS. First, their findings show that CHSAS does an exemplary job (much better job than most schools in Chicago and in the state of Illinois) in narrowing academic achievement gaps.
For African Americans:
And for low-income:
CHSAS has achieved the above learning outcomes not because the school district dictated how and what the school must teach. The study quotes the school's principal:
You’d talk about the kids and talk about the teaching and how you can connect what you’re teaching, so we [CHSAS] started doing that. So, that’s how I picked up on this curriculum framework project; they [teachers] try to make these interdisciplinary connections. We all brought down our curriculum maps a few years ago and said…If you’re studying the Great Depression in U.S. history and you’re reading Grapes of Wrath in English let’s do those simultaneously. In our agriculture class, let’s cover the impact on soil erosion during the Dust Bowl years. So now, if the connections are there, make them [but] don’t spend time making connections where they don’t belong, if they’re fake.The teachers designed the curriculum. And it clearly demonstrates how local creativity can provide local solutions to local problems. This is what centralization and micromanagement can never achieve.