"Bear in mind that the wonderful things you learn in your schools are the work of many generations, produced by enthusiastic effort and infinite labor in every country of the world. All this is put into your hands as your inheritance in order that you may receive it, honor it, add to it, and one day faithfully hand it to your children. Thus do we mortals achieve immortality in the permanent things which we create in common." - Albert Einstein

Tuesday, April 29, 2014

Poverty and Graduation Rates

There is a correlation between the income level of a family and graduation rates. In a previous article posted on this blog, "Functional Literacy and Out of School Children in the Philippines" the following data from "Why are some Filipino children not in school?" have been highlighted:

Above table captured from "Why are some Filipino children not in school?"
The following figure also brings out the striking correlation between poverty and not graduating:

Downloaded from "Profile of Out-of-School Children in the Philippines"
The above shows the situation in the Philippines. One may be surprised to see that such correlation also exists in the United States. It is surprising because the United States unlike the Philippines has Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965. (Financial Assistance To Local Educational Agencies For The Education Of Children Of Low-Income Families). The United States also has a nationwide School Breakfast Program and a School Lunch Program. There is also Head Starta federal program that provides early childhood programs for low-income families. Title I and these programs aim to provide additional resources to schools that serve children from low income families. Thus, it is interesting to examine what the current situation is in the United States. Here are the most recent data from "Building a Grad Nation: Progress and Challenges in Ending the High School Dropout Epidemic" :

The problematic states in the above map are pink in color. These are states where the high school graduation rates for non low-income students are still below 80%. Quite a number of states have already reached 90% graduation rates for children who are not experiencing poverty. Massachusetts, for example, has 94%. The situation is dramatically different for poor children:

Almost every state in the above map is pink and eighteen states are seeing below 70% of their poor children graduating from high school. The situation looks grimmer with students with disabilities:

Only a third or less of students with disabilities in Louisiana, Mississippi and Nevada are able to finish high school. Are the government programs in the United States not working? The programs mentioned above do have a positive effect on poor school children and those with special needs. The problem lies in a shift in emphasis on education reforms. The report, Poverty and Education: Finding the Way Forward, points out the following:

The above programs can work but these need to be implemented seriously with great commitment. Lip service is not enough especially when the government spends much more effort on curriculum reforms and antagonizing teachers. Programs that do not address poverty directly can in fact do harm. One can see that the list of programs that do not help address the problem of poverty in schools matches a lot of the effort that the Department of Education in the Philippines does (Its focus on K+12, performance-based bonuses, and private school vouchers). The Philippines does learn from the United States. The problem is that the country unfortunately copies only what is wrong.

Sunday, April 27, 2014

Education Cannot Solve Poverty

There is the myth that climate has changed before so we, humans, cannot be responsible for what is currently happening with our planet. Myths owe their longevity to their intrinsic appeal to common sense. Unfortunately, attractiveness is the only thing that myths have. It is completely divorced from reality. Another myth embraced by so many is the belief that education is the solution to poverty. I used to subscribe to this idea as well. After all, my education was indeed responsible for where I am now. However, in an analogous fashion, it has been very cold this winter, even the great lakes have been frozen, so global warming is probably a hoax. Of course, these are individual points. Temperatures in my neighborhood do not necessarily represent the long term trends in global climate. The globe is so much bigger than my backyard or even the continent where I live. The same holds for education. Individual cases are not sufficient to show that education is the solution to poverty. In the same manner, famous school dropouts who have founded successful companies cannot be used as arguments against staying in school.

Poverty crushes education. Education cannot solve poverty. It is the other way around. Problems in education can be alleviated if poverty is addressed first. In "Engaging Students with Poverty in Mind", Eric Jensen makes clear that poverty can block student learning through the following factors:
  • Health and nutrition
  • Vocabulary
  • Effort and energy
  • Mind-set
  • Cognitive capacity
  • Relationships
  • Stress level
One factor in school that may mitigate effects of poverty on learning is the teacher. Unfortunately, teacher quality is likewise affected by poverty, as seen in the following graph:

Above figure copied from "Looking at the Best Teachers and Who They Teach"
Schools attended by poor children have less highly effective teachers. Poor children are three times more likely to be taught by ineffective teachers. Of course, some may point out that more teachers are rated ineffective in schools where pupils are poor simply because it is much more difficult to teach in those schools. Either way, this simply highlights the reality that poverty crushes education.

It’s often said that a good education will help lift children out of poverty. In fact, the opposite is more often true: not living in poverty allows children to do well in school. 
Low literacy rates in low-income areas aren’t a curriculum issue or a pedagogy issue. They’re a social justice issue. Reducing poverty rates (and improving literacy) requires more than a new reading program or even better social services. It means actively working for policies that fight income inequality, like a higher minimum wage, stronger labour laws and restoration of federal and provincial corporate tax rates to fair levels. Education doesn’t happen in a vacuum.
A professor at the University of Illinois - Urbana, Champaign, John Marsh, together with his colleagues, used to teach humanities classes in the evening to low-income adults in the community from 2005-2009. The program is called the Odyssey project. Marsh wrote a book about three years ago to explain further what he really thought about this project:

That book is "Class Dismissed: Why We Cannot Teach or Learn Our Way Out of Inequality"

Class Dismissed

Education cannot solve poverty. Class dismissed....

Thursday, April 24, 2014

Misaligned Spending on Technology

Since I have been part of a group that helped elementary schools in the Philippines obtain computers, I occasionally receive requests for computer donations from other schools. What is sorely lacking in these requests unfortunately is a proposal, a plan of how these computers can assist learning in a classroom. Computers are tools. We do not pick up any tool without having an idea of how we are going to use them.There are plenty of digital instructional tools available now. Apparently, only half of teachers in the United States regard these as effective. This survey comes from a report recently released by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. The report, "Teachers Know Best: What Educators Want from Digital Instructional Tools", highlights the finding that resources teachers would like to see are simply not available.

To read this report visit Teachers Know Best
The gaps are high especially in the sciences at all levels of K-12 while the market seems to have an ample supply for mathematics and for english language arts. The most striking result shared in this report, however, is the huge misalignment between what tools teachers in the US deem as effective and what administrators in school districts are buying. This is shown vividly in the following graph (copied from Teachers Know Best without permission):

Above figure copied from Teachers Know Best
Almost half of the spending is on devices (whiteboards, clickers) which teachers deem only as 67% effective. Districts are likewise spending more on English Language Arts than in any subject. And at the end of the report, the following quote from one of the three thousand teachers surveyed should strike a chord:

“Student learning is the goal. It must 
remain the goal. We put a man on the moon 
largely with slide rules and calculators, 
so it’s hard to argue that the technology 
is essential for learning. It must enhance 
the learning experience in order for it to 
be implemented in my class—I don’t do 
technology for the sake of the technology. 
… Every resource is available to me … 
but frankly a lot of technology is more 
‘gee whiz’ and fails to meet the criteria of 
enhancing student learning.”

Tuesday, April 22, 2014

Is College Becoming Like Kindergarten?

The following is a lecture given by a 4-year old to her father who teaches college chemistry:

"Your class just sits and listens to you. In my class there's playing, and reading books, and listening to teachers, and "circle time", and nap. And your class just listens. Why?"

Good thing, my daughter has not heard that I also give exams in class.

I posted the above video and received the following comments:
  • "Uh-oh! She's challenging you and maybe you need to think about how you conduct your classes Angel. You had better come up with a good answer to that why."
  • "I'll bet she gets pretty high evaluation scores from her students."
  • "I wanna be her student! Then maybe, I'd start liking Chemistry a bit more! I'd like the nap time idea too. Nothing personal, Prof."
My daughter is not in kindergarten yet. She maybe disappointed at what kindergarten in the United States is shaping into:
Published in: American Educational Research JournalDecember 2013vol. 50 no. 6
Additionally, the title alone of the following blog article written in response to the above study may bring some discomfort:

Above copied from Edweek
On one hand, education reformers are pushing for greater academic rigor in the early years. On the other hand, college may need reexamination. My daughter may be surprised to see the following:

There is in fact a book released by the University of Chicago Press that raised doubts regarding the quality of higher education in the United States:

Academically Adrift
InsideHigherEd has kindly provided a summary of the findings reported in the above book:
  • 45 percent of students "did not demonstrate any significant improvement in learning" during the first two years of college.
  • 36 percent of students "did not demonstrate any significant improvement in learning" over four years of college....
...The main culprit for lack of academic progress of students,... that students spend, on average, only about 12-14 hours a week studying, and that much of this time is studying in groups. 
The research then goes on to find a direct relationship between rigor and gains in learning: 
  • Students who study by themselves for more hours each week gain more knowledge -- while those who spend more time studying in peer groups see diminishing gains.
  • Students whose classes reflect high expectations (more than 40 pages of reading a week and more than 20 pages of writing a semester) gained more than other students.
  • Students who spend more time in fraternities and sororities show smaller gains than other students.
  • Students who engage in off-campus or extracurricular activities (including clubs and volunteer opportunities) have no notable gains or losses in learning.
  • Students majoring in liberal arts fields see "significantly higher gains in critical thinking, complex reasoning, and writing skills over time than students in other fields of study." Students majoring in business, education, social work and communications showed the smallest gains. (The authors note that this could be more a reflection of more-demanding reading and writing assignments, on average, in the liberal arts courses than of the substance of the material.)
Apparently, there is already too much "circle time" in college. I guess at this point, I will end the same way my daughter did.


Monday, April 21, 2014

Reading in the Mother Tongue

Imagine a school that does not use the language used at home as medium of instruction in the early years of schooling. In such an environment, one may guess that what happens at home matters a lot. In fact, it does. There is now a study published that captures and answers the question of how literacy at home affects early childhood learning. The study looks at more than a hundred children from English-speaking families studying at six public schools that employ a French immersion program. The French immersion program uses French exclusively as medium of instruction for kindergarten and Grade 1. Reading instruction in English is then introduced as a daily 60 minute subject in Grade 2. In this scenario, any English the children know by the end of Grade 1 comes mainly from their homes. The study finds that there is indeed a strong correlation between literacy activities at home, both formal and informal, and a child's reading ability and vocabulary. Formal activities include teaching the alphabet, and providing reading and printing instructions. Informal activities are measured by the number of books available to the children as well as by how often books are read to children.

Reading and Early Childhood Learning
The study, published in the journal Child Development, has the following summary:

Sénéchal, M. and LeFevre, J.-A. (2014), Continuity and Change in the Home Literacy Environment as Predictors of Growth in Vocabulary and Reading. Child Development. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12222
The findings may sound obvious, but it should be made clear that in this instance, because of the inherent design of the study, the impact of literacy activities at home on a child's learning have been cleverly extracted. These are therefore evidence-based conclusions:
"In sum, we found evidence of long-term associations between parent home literacy practices and child reading and vocabulary. First, parent reports of teaching and parent expectations about reading in kindergarten were a robust predictor of growth in child early literacy from kindergarten to the beginning of Grade 1. Second, parent reports of teaching and listening to their child read was also a solid predictor of growth in word reading from the beginning until the end of Grade 1. Third, most parents who increased the reported amount of teaching from Grade 1 to Grade 2 had children whose reading was below average in Grade 1, whereas most parents who decreased their teaching had children whose reading was above average. Finally, parent reports of shared reading in kindergarten predicted growth in child vocabulary from kindergarten to Grade 1. Taken together, the present findings provided strong support for the key prediction of the Home Literacy Model, namely, that formal and informal literacy practices have different links to the development of children's oral and written language skills. The findings extend the model by showing that most parents adjust their formal literacy practices according to the reading performance of their child."
The authors do note that about half of the parents of the children included in this study are well educated (college level). Still, the study shows that parents can help teach children beyond kindergarten.

The above study takes place in a community where English is the dominant language but French is used as the medium of instruction. By not providing English in the early years, children are able to learn a second language in school. Home literacy can play a vital role in early childhood education. The home is really the first place where a child learns. If we truly treasure our mother tongue, we should spend our efforts passing our language to our young at home.

Friday, April 18, 2014

Engagement of Teachers: Key to School Improvement

Both in reading and math, teachers serve the important role of measuring the pulse of their students. Effective teachers are those who could navigate various ways to reach children. Experience, which enables a balance between order and innovation, plus mastery of the subject provides the necessary tools for teachers to discover and develop various approaches to help students learn. However, even with the best tools and resources, even with the best talent, teachers can only be good if they are strongly motivated. Motivation happens if teachers take ownership of their work. Motivation unfortunately does not work when teachers are treated as robots. And here is the bad news: According to a Gallup survey, "Teachers are dead last among the occupational groups Gallup surveyed in terms of their likelihood to say their opinions seem to count at work." In the United States, teachers in K-12 are among the highest to express satisfaction with their lives overall (second only to physicians). Thus, it is troubling that with regard to work, teachers are not as engaged:

Above image captured from Gallup's report, State of America's Schools, The Path to Winning Again in Education
The Gallup report offers some advice:

The first advice is especially striking. It goes to the heart of how we really view teachers. It is truly the first question we need to ask before we even start dreaming up schemes on how to improve basic education. If we skip this one, we are missing a very important point. This is one of the biggest pitfalls of failed education reforms. This is the strongest objection against the Philippines' education reform. Teachers do not have a voice. When teachers are disengaged, it is highly unlikely that students will be engaged. And with a lack of engagement, learning hardly occurs....

Wednesday, April 16, 2014

Experience Matters in Teaching: One Big Reason Why We Should Treat Teachers Right

The previous post in this blog, "What is wrong with how we are teaching math?", underscores the importance of assessing what students need. Teaching is supposed to be a lifelong process of learning as well. It must be responsive. It is true that there are quite a few individuals who seem to have an inborn talent of connecting with students but for most of us, we need experience to improve our teaching. For this reason, it maybe useful to examine how teachers are introduced to the profession. It is likewise helpful to look at teacher turnover rates as this affects not only student learning but also undermines investments in both time and resources on the country's teaching force. The following is an example of such study:

To read the report, visit Beginning Teacher Attrition and Mobility
Among the findings of the above study are: "Of the teachers who began teaching in public schools in 2007 or 2008, about 10 percent were not teaching in 2008–09, and 12 percent were not teaching in 2009–10." These are alarming numbers. It is not surprising then that University of Pennsylvania's Richard Ingersoll extrapolates that about half of school teachers leave the profession within their first five years of teaching.

Why is teacher retention important? There are so many reasons. It takes years to learn how to navigate a curriculum. It takes years to master lesson plans, techniques, and teaching resources. But one big reason is that it takes time for a teacher to actually know his or her students. It takes several years to get introduced to students who come with different backgrounds, attitude, likes, dislikes and temperament. Most "theories" about learning out there are actually quack science. (the use of the word "theories" here obviously do not correspond to its proper usage in science) A recent paper by Begeny and Greene in Psychology in the Schools illustrates an example:

Begeny, J. C. and Greene, D. J. (2014), CAN READABILITY FORMULAS BE USED TO SUCCESSFULLY GAUGE DIFFICULTY OF READING MATERIALS?. Psychol. Schs., 51: 198–215. doi: 10.1002/pits.21740
The above work is on something that may appear simple. The readability measure of a given material describes the level of difficulty. With such measure, it is hoped that reading assignments can be made appropriately. One example is shown below:
The Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level Readability Formula 
Step 1: Calculate the average number of words used per sentence. 
Step 2: Calculate the average number of syllables per word. 
Step 3: Multiply the average number of words by 0.39 and add it to the average number of syllables per word multiplied by 11.8. 
Step 4: Subtract 15.59 from the result. 
The specific mathematical formula is: 
FKRA = (0.39 x ASL) + (11.8 x ASW) - 15.59 
FKRA = Flesch-Kincaid Reading Age 
ASL = Average Sentence Length (i.e., the number of words divided by the number of sentences) 
ASW = Average number of Syllable per Word (i.e., the number of syllables divided by the number of words) 
Analyzing the results is a simple exercise. For instance, a score of 5.0 indicates a grade-school level; i.e., a score of 9.3 means that a ninth grader would be able to read the document. This score makes it easier for teachers, parents, librarians, and others to judge the readability level of various books and texts for the students. 
Theoretically, the lowest grade level score could be -3.4, but since there are no real passages that have every sentence consisting of a one-syllable word, it is a highly improbable result in practice. 
What the authors found is that scales or equations like the one above do not really work. The above results highlight the importance of teachers being able to gauge by themselves where their students are and choose appropriately what their students should be reading. A lot of teaching is really learned inside a classroom, a concrete example of why experience matters....

Monday, April 14, 2014

What Is Wrong with How We Are Teaching Math?

Although quite a number of people would be quick to respond, the above question is in fact complex and difficult to answer. There is a tendency to dislike one specific algorithm or way to solve a problem, yet some people unknowingly subscribe to one specific way of teaching children how to do math. Some even go as far as teaching so many ways to do math that not subscribing to this diverse set is now viewed as wrong. Rote learning is frowned upon, but now students need to go through mindless and seemingly endless examples of various ways that learning by drill during my time as a grade school student seems like a walk in the park. For instance, here are five ways to add 47 and 35:

Above image copied from Five Ways to Add Multi-digit Whole Numbers

Friday, April 11, 2014

If we could do income tax the way DepEd Delivers learning materials

by Joy Rizal

Originally posted on Facebook
April 9, 2014 at 3:23am
If you watch any TV here in the Philippines you are sure to have seen the recent ad spots by our government reminding everyone to register, fill out our tax forms correctly, and pay.

I could talk about how much fun it has been to go to the government office for copies of the tax forms, only to discover once at home that no instructions were included.  This makes doing the paperwork very difficult when the forms say enter the amount following the instructions of section whatever.  When there is no instruction section whatever. Even the work schedule pages say fill in the number following instructions from another mysterious non-included instruction section.

Ask why the instruction pages are not included?  The basic response is we do not have enough and cannot afford to copy them for everyone.

(And the Philippine government officials wonder why they have so much trouble getting cooperation from the people.)

However grumbling about Income Tax and how it is currently implemented is not what I want to write about today.   For I believe I have discovered the solution for all of our tax woes.

After many hours of consultations with special committees and exhaustive discussions with specialists, (see foot note 1) I believe I have come up with a solution to the income tax problem that should be acceptable to everyone.  Especially since we will be following the example set by the Philippine Government - Specifically The Philippine Department of Education (DEPED).

The solution is to fill out and file the tax forms and pay our taxes the same way The Philippine Department of Education apparently fills out its government documentation and the way it delivers text books, learning materials, etc.

The following is one possible example of how we might process the Income Tax if we followed the precedence set by DEPED.

Wednesday, April 9, 2014

What Should Children Learn in School?

By simply raising standards, it does not mean learning will improve inside classrooms. An obsession with goals and assessments does not guarantee quality education. Such exercise is usually myopic, boiling down to our own often misguided answers to the question "What should children learn in school?".

Our answers are often misguided because we fail to see that a fruitful relationship between a teacher and a student must be truly dynamic and responsive. Teaching begins first and foremost with getting to know the student. Learning also works with the student getting to know the teacher. In order to advance, learning inside the classroom must begin not with setting the goals, but with identifying the strengths and challenges of a student. Instead of asking what children should learn, the first question must be "What does a child need?"

It is truly an entirely different question. No one should be able to answer this question without knowing the child first.  As adults viewing education, it may help by trying to see the child inside each and everyone of us. Here are my thoughts:

  • We are social and we long for acceptance. We like to do well in sports and we transfer that enthusiasm to our children. A child who is clumsy or poor in motor skills faces a truly difficult time growing up. Fortunately, we do not do the same thing with children who are challenged in math. 
  • We buy lottery tickets but we do understand the odds. We see successful entrepreneurs who brought us Microsoft, Apple, Google and even Facebook. I hope we do realize the odds with that as well. The basketball or football coach in a university has a much higher salary than most professors do. We need to remember though that the university has only one basketball coach. The probability that a kindergarten classroom has one future university basketball coach is much lower than having one future university professor. We need to be realistic.
  • Life is certainly multidimensional. Life is broad. It is only natural that when we set our goals, we limit ourselves. It is ironic. As individuals, we can specialize, we can focus, but we certainly must allow for diversity if we are talking about a group of children. 
  • Those of us who have found passion in our work knows what engagement truly is. That engagement is no different from the energy we have as children playing our favorite games. It is that engagement that we must aspire for inside the classroom.
In order for learning in this century to become a true step in progress, we must finally acknowledge that each child inside a classroom is a unique body, heart and mind.

If We Only Regard Them as Our Very Own....

Downloaded from Photo Blog by Sidney Snoeck,  Sarisari Store

Monday, April 7, 2014

Where Does the Philippines Stand in the Global Youth Wellbeing Index

There is a new global index. There is now an index that focuses on the youth. Early this month, Nicole Goldin with co-authors Payal Patel and Katherine Perry published The Global Youth Wellbeing Index. This report is a joint effort between the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) and the International Youth Foundation (IYF) with funding from the Hilton Worldwide. The survey looks at the well being of youth defined in the report as individuals aged 12 to 24. The report covers 30 countries, representing different levels of income and encompassing nearly 70 percent of the world's youth population. Where does the Philippines stand? Below is the overall ranking:

Above figure copied from the Global Youth Wellbeing Index
The Philippines is #22, ranking below its neighbors Thailand, Vietnam and Indonesia. The index measures the following different domains and the numbers shown in the last column is the Philippines' rank in that particular domain:

Above figure copied from the Global Youth Wellbeing Index
The ranking of the countries in each domain is shown in the following:

Above figure copied from the Global Youth Wellbeing Index
To have a better idea of the scores in each domain, the following data are also shown. Keep in mind that the Philippines is in the lowest third so its score in each domain lies somewhere between the blue and green bars. It should be noted that in the overall ranking, only 12 countries (the upper third) score above the average. 

Above figure copied from the Global Youth Wellbeing Index
The above are indeed self-explanatory. The above index does have its limitations. The education index, for example, hardly uses any measure of learning outcomes. With scores in international standardized exams, the ranking may be dramatically different. It should be noted that in the current ranking in education, the United States is #3, with only Spain and Australia ranking above.

Friday, April 4, 2014

When We Try to Fit Everyone in a Box....

There was a Tagalog poem which I read when I was in college, "Ako ang Daigdig" ("I am the world") by Alejandro G. Abadilla. The poem impressed me not just with its content, but so much more with its style. It was different and in so many ways, was a real strong and proud proclamation of one's uniqueness. This month is "Autism Awareness Month". The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in the United States have recently released the following data:

Above image and caption from
Ten Things to Know About New Autism Data
The number 1 in 68 is just one of the ten things the CDC wants us to know about their most recent data on autism. Another one of those things is that almost half of the children identified with autism had average or above average intellectual ability. Autism is a spectrum. I have had two opportunities to observe a social skills class for young children at a Jewish community center in Fairfax, Virginia. In a class of a dozen children, each individual is unique. It is like reading twelve different poems, twelve different worlds. The following are several paragraphs from an article written by Tom Kershaw:

Tuesday, April 1, 2014

The Case Against a Curriculum

There are various media through which information may be disseminated. Popular press and social media have the widest reach. With regard to very important issues, mass media indeed shoulder a great responsibility. With complicated matters, pundits are necessary to provide expert opinions so that the public could be best informed. Oftentimes, materials that need to be digested by the public are quite voluminous, deep or too complex that the eyes of an expert become indispensable. Reforms are being introduced on education in the US and in the Philippines. Unfortunately, in both cases, the media seem to have failed in informing the public. With a poorly informed public, political strategies are then very much in play. In the Philippines, where politics is still personality based and oligarchic, the media dropping the ball on correctly informing the public about education reforms serves the purpose of keeping everyone in the dark. In the United States, keeping a reform under a low key may initially be beneficial at the first stages, but in the end, backlash will occur if people suddenly discover something very consequential is being imposed without their knowledge. Continuously misinforming the public works very well in an oligarchic society. However, for a bitterly divided and partisan society like the United States, lack of information fuels only further bickering and propaganda from both sides. A midst this predicament, I am not even sure we know what a curriculum is.

In the Philippines, the K+12 curriculum had been introduced. The curriculum change was so extensive that it was completely mind boggling that it managed to pass both houses of legislature without any hitch. The main items in the new curriculum are (1) compulsory kindergarten, (2) two added years at the end of high school, (3) spiral curriculum in math and the sciences, with science being introduced as a formal subject only in the third grade, (4) mother tongue based - multilingual instruction, with reading and writing in English only being introduced in the second grade, and (5) emphasis on the use of inquiry-based learning methods.

This blog has laid out various criticisms of this curriculum in so many posted articles. In addition, there is likewise the question of implementation of a curriculum. This blog has also cited some learning materials and their current low quality. Lessons are indeed the tangible manifestation of a curriculum inside a classroom, but one still must not confuse what needs to be taught against how it is being taught.

Objections to the K+12 curriculum in the Philippines are basically mute. This blog has been one of the few voices and one reason I heard (This one comes from Filipinos with PhD's) is that we should simply trust DepEd since these people know better. There is widespread apathy. One reason behind the lack of engagement is that unlike my peers, I have children who are just beginning formal schooling. The children of my high school classmates, for example, are now finishing college. Unlike my peers, basic education to me is not simply a memory from the past, but an actual scenario on which the future of my own children depends.